Is it really an AI tell?

People judge writing by the word delve, the em dash, missing contractions. This page counts each of those in the same documents written by a person and by language models, one kind of writing at a time, and shows the sentences it counted.

This is not a detector. Nothing here can tell you who wrote a text, and a text full of these markers proves nothing. The tables are mostly evidence of how little they prove.

Across kinds of writing

Each cell is one kind of writing, with the verdict of the model that kind is decided against, named in its column head, against the people of that kind.

▲ model marker the model uses it more · ▼ more human the person uses it more · ◆ careful writing both, more than casual writers · – no signal · · not recorded no text of that kind can show it

Not covered: email, chat, product reviews, and social platforms other than Reddit, such as X, Facebook and LinkedIn. Student essays are covered, with the machine side written for this project rather than taken from a published set.

The markers in research abstracts

Every column up to the last model is the same set of documents: written by a person, and written again by each model from the same prompt (RAID). Click a row to see what was counted.

One document, every writer

The same prompt answered by every writer. Counted markers are highlighted. Documents are drawn at random from the ones every writer covered, not chosen.

Check a text

Paste anything. The markers in it are highlighted and each one is shown next to how often people use it in the kind of writing picked above. There is no score, because the tables above do not support one. Nothing leaves your browser.

How it is counted